Home» Mumbai Massacre Torahcode Experiments

# Mumbai Massacre Torahcode Experiments

On this webpage, we show the network of Torah code tables that resulted from our experiments as described previously. Each table must have one of the key word for each of the topic categories: What and Where , plus key words from at least two of the other the remaining four categories: Who, When Date, When Year and How.

## Who When Date

### Taj Mahal

There was no statistically signficant table for the Who When Date category involving the Taj Mahal.

### Oberoi

The search produced a cylinder size of 78. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 133/10,000.

The search produced a cylinder size of 181. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 7.5/10,000.

## Who When Year

### Taj Mahal

There was no statistically signficant table for the Who When Year category involving the Taj Mahal.

### Oberoi

The search produced a cylinder size of 107. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 55/10,000.

The search produced a cylinder size of 152. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 30.5/10,000.

## Who How

### Taj Mahal

Right:
Left: The search produced a cylinder size of 6449. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 59.5/10,000.

### Oberoi

The search produced a cylinder size of 58. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 57/10,000.

### Nariman

Left: The search produced a cylinder size of 204. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 66/10,000.

## When Date Year

The search produced a cylinder size of 73. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 29.5/10,000.

## When Date How

The search produced a cylinder size of 2539. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 15.5/10,000.

## When Year How

The search produced a cylinder size of 12,636. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 48.5/10,000.