Home» The Gaza Flotilla |
|
The Gaza Flotilla
Background
There are a number of dimensions of the Gaza Flotilla event for which we
can explore Torah code tables. The first area we explore is dominated by the name of the event.
In English it would be called Gaza Flotilla. If one examines the first dictionary definition of flotilla,
it is a fleet of typically small naval vessels, two or more squadrons moving
in some coordinated activity. The second meaning is that of a group moving together, with no requirement
that the group have anything to do with boats or ships. The Hebrew
word for the first meaning of flotilla is שייטת.
However, in Hebrew the exclusive meaning of שייטת is that of a military naval flotilla. The Hebrew word in current useage for a flotilla of ships as the Gaza flotilla is משט. If we were to translate the word משט to English, the translation would be the sail, in the sense of the sail toward or the sailing toward.
Indeed the phrase used in the Hebrew newspapers for
Gaza flotilla is משט לעזה,
literally the sail to Gaza. So our first group of Torah code tables is built around the phrase משט לעזה, sail to Gaza.
The experimental setup is shown in the possibility table below.
This is the table of possiblities among which the first flotilla Torah code experiment searched.
We show the Torah code tables in the order of most significant to least significant.
The search produced a cylinder size of 22 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 2.5/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 31,232 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 38.5/100,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 6,835 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 6.5/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 31,232 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 6.5/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 22 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 10.5/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 6833 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 11.5/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 6834 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 12.5/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 6835 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 14.5/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 31,232 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 17.5/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 6834 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 24/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 6833 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 26/10,000.
The search produced a cylinder size of 15,618 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 216/100,000.